A full-service media consulting business • Multi-media campaigns, including internet • Freelance news reporting service • Political Commentary and Analysis • Voice-over talent, audio narration services, commercial voices • Public relations campaigns • Crisis communications consultants • Polling • Media training for business and executives • Press Release and News Conference preparation

“The Sunday Political Brunch” -- August 2, 2015


(Fort Lauderdale, Florida) – We’re on the road this week in the key battleground state of Florida, where I spent fifteen years as a political reporter. Once again the Sunshine State could be the Presidential kingmaker. It’s a must-win if the Republicans are to take back the White House. In 2000 I predicted it would be the most important state in that election cycle; and it was. I will make the same prediction right now that Florida will be the crucial Electoral College state in 2016. Let’s brunch on that this week:

“History” – Florida is a very good predictor of who will become President. In my lifetime (which began in 1959), the Sunshine State has been on the losing side only twice. In 1960, when it had a mere ten Electoral College votes, Florida went for losing candidate Richard Nixon. In 1992, Florida went to President George H.W. Bush, who lost nationally to Bill Clinton. Today, Florida has 29 Electoral College votes and - as we saw in 2000 - can be the deciding factor.

“Jeb Bush Statewide” – He may be white, but it bears noting that in 1998 - in his first successful bid for Governor of Florida - Jeb Bush took home 61 percent of the Hispanic vote. Four years later, his reelection bid garnered 57 percent of Latino voters. Yes, Bush has a Mexican wife and three mixed-race children; he speaks fluent Spanish; and Cuban-Americans love Republicans. But, wow! Sixty-one percent of the Latino vote in Florida? That’s a huge, huge asset as he pursues the race for the White House. One word of caution to Republicans, though: They only do well with candidates who have strong ties to the Latino voters. In 2014, incumbent Governor Rick Scott (R-FL) won only 38 percent of Latin votes.

“Rubio Statewide” – While he has only run once statewide in Florida – and he won – Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) has very telling poll numbers. He won 55 percent of the state’s Hispanic vote (and he is a well-known Cuban-American politician); but he also won 55 percent of the white vote in Florida. Rubio – if he is the GOP nominee – will be formidable in his home state.

“Hillary Money Lead” – According to Associated Press analysis of Federal Election Commission documents, Hillary Clinton leads in cash from Florida donors with $3 million. Jeb Bush has collected $2.6 million from Sunshine State donors; and Marco Rubio is in third place with $1.8 million in donations. This is critical because Florida has ten television markets where advertising dollars are crucial; and the Clintons have strong pockets of popularity here. While Bill Clinton lost Florida (but still won the White House) in 1992, he did take Florida in 1996 in his reelection bid over Bob Dole.

“VP Bill Nelson?” – If Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee, she will likely consider some prominent Floridians for the Vice Presidential slot on the ticket. Topping the list might be Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL), who has won statewide in Florida five times. Even though he is 72 years old, Nelson has to be considered if he’s in good health. The fact that he once flew a mission as an astronaut on the Space Shuttle doesn’t hurt. He has 15 years in the U.S. Senate, 12 in the U.S. House, six as the State Insurance Commissioner plus six years as a State Representative. He has a long Florida resume!

“Latino Vote” – The Hispanic population in Florida is critical. It is 24 percent today, more than double the Latino population when I moved there in 1984. One of the biggest subgroups is the Cuban population, which surged in South Florida in 1959, when people fled Cuba after Fidel Castro came to power. Cuban-Americans have traditionally been one of the most conservative voting blocks in the state, giving candidates such as Marco Rubio and the Bush brothers a huge boost.

“George W. Bush” – George W. Bush won Florida in 2000 by a hotly-contested 537 votes. But the real tale-of-the-tape is how he did among Hispanic voters. According to Roper Polling, nationwide in 2000, he won 36 percent of the Latino vote; in 2004, he won 44 percent of the Hispanic vote and won a second term. By comparison, John McCain won just 31 percent of Latino voters in 2008, and Mitt Romney won a mere 27 percent in his losing effort in 2012. Republicans don’t have to win the Hispanic vote to win the White House; they just have to be more competitive. If they get 40 percent Latino support nationwide, they will likely be back in residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

“Where it Stands Today” – Most of the recent polling is focused on intraparty contests in 2016. Needless to say, Jeb Bush, Hillary Clinton, and Marco Rubio are the top three choices for Florida primary voters. The most recent theoretical November, 2016, poll from Public Policy Polling has it Hillary Clinton 47 percent, to Jeb Bush 44 percent; and Hillary Clinton 48 percent, to Marco Rubio 46 percent. At best, that tells you it’s too close to call; and Florida is clearly up for grabs as a top prize in the 2016 Presidential election.

Who is your choice? Just click the comment button at www.MarkCurtisMedia.com and let us know who you would like to see next in the Oval Office!

© 2015 -- Mark Curtis Media, LLC.

Photo courtesy:

“The Sunday Political Brunch” -- July 26, 2015


(Providence, Rhode Island) – Everywhere I go, it’s the only question I get: “Can Donald Trump really win the Republican nomination? Can he really be elected President?” He continues to dominate the entire 2016 Presidential campaign among candidates from both sides of the aisle. I have made a few comments here and there in recent weeks, but let’s “brunch” on the whole Trump phenomenon this week!

“By the Numbers” – The latest Public Policy Poll out on July 23 has “The Donald” in the lead. Here are the numbers: Trump 19 percent; Governor Scott Walker (R-WI), 17 percent; former Governor Jeb Bush (R-FL), 12 percent; Dr. Ben Carson, 10 percent; Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), 10 percent; former Governor Mike Huckabee (R-AR), 8 percent; 4 percent each for Carly Fiorina, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), and Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX); 3 percent apiece for Governor John Kasich (R-OH) and Governor Chris Christie (R-NJ); and 1 percent for former Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA), Governor Bobby Jindal (R-LA), and former Governor Rick Perry R-TX). Three others had less than 1 percent. As always, polls are a snapshot of today only, not a predictor of November, 2016.

“GOP vs. Hillary” – Winning the GOP nomination is one thing, but winning the White House is quite another. Trump would have to get out the Republican base (which is not guaranteed after he has angered some key party elders), and he has to win a majority of those registered as independents. Right now, here’s how potential GOP rivals stack up to Hillary Clinton in the latest USA Today poll: Clinton 46 percent, Bush 42 percent; Clinton 46 percent, Rubio, 40 percent; Clinton 49 percent, Huckabee 40 percent; Clinton 58 percent, Walker 37 percent; Clinton 51 percent, Trump 34 percent. Yes, Trump can win the nomination, but right now four other GOP contenders fare better head to head against Hillary Clinton.

“Fiorina Insight” – To really grasp Trump’s buzz, you need to look at two other candidates – Carly Fiorina and Dr. Ben Carson. None of the three has ever held elective office. Of Trump, Fiorina told ABC News: "He “taps into an anger that I hear every day.” While she and Trump differ widely on the issues and don’t really like each other, Fiorina noted that she, Trump, and Carson are not part of the “professional political class” that runs both parties. All three candidates have appeal to disaffected voters who feel they have no voice in American politics. Here’s my prediction: Carson has already peaked; Trump will peak; but keep your eyes on Fiorina. She may wind up the VP nominee or promised a position as Treasury Secretary, but she – pardon the pun – has legs.

“Perot Comparison” – Trump’s surging appeal takes me back to 1992 and Ross Perot’s insurgent third-party Presidential campaign. Perot was also a wealthy, successful businessman who appealed to the disaffected, and shot from the hip in his stump speech (even if he sometimes put his foot in his mouth, like Trump). In April, 1992, the Gallup Poll had it President George H.W. Bush 42 percent; Governor Bill Clinton (D-AR) 25 percent; and H. Ross Perot (I-TX) at 24 percent. But Perot’s maverick stump speech took off; and, by mid-June, it was Perot 39 percent, Bush 31 percent, and Clinton stuck at 25 percent. A month later, Perot quit the race, only to rejoin in October. The final vote was Clinton 43 percent; Bush 38 percent; and Perot 19 percent. My point is that - like Perot - Trump may spike now only to fade over the next year of the campaign.

“Media Coverage” – As with Perot, there’s a huge media fascination with Trump. He, in fact, is dominating the media coverage. But a backlash has started by some media outlets. The Huffington Post says it will no longer cover Trump in its political section and, instead, is relegating him to the celebrity news area with the likes of the Kardashians and Taylor Swift. On the other hand, Fox News Channel can’t get enough of Trump. He is on all the time, much to the chagrin of the other GOP candidates.

“Advantage Trump” – I don’t want to overstate my Ross Perot-Donald Trump analogy, but some of the similarities bear discussion. Let’s say Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum, Ted Cruz, and Jim Gilmore don’t fare well in Iowa and New Hampshire. They may be forced out of the race simply because they are “vote poor” and “cash poor.” Jeb Bush - even if he doesn’t win either of the first two contests - still has name recognition and big campaign funds, so he can overcome a slow start. But the only GOP candidate who can self-fund a fight to the bitter end is Trump. Like Perot, he cuts another check, and he keeps on running.

“Three’s a Crowd?” – Of course my last comment begs the question: If Trumps continues to sour with the Republican core establishment, will he run as a third-party candidate, like Perot? He says no, but I think it’s very possible. He likes the game; he likes the buzz; he likes the headlines; and I think he’d really like to be President. For months I have talked about a repeat of the 1992 Clinton-Bush election fight; but, yes, we could see an even closer comparison if it’s Bush-Clinton-Trump(a/k/a Perot clone) on the ballot. It could happen folks!

For whom would you vote in the “1992 Re-do Election?” Let us know by clicking the comment button at www.MarkCurtisMedia.com.

© 2015, Mark Curtis Media, LLC.

Photo credit: cnn.com

Syndicate content