Blogs

Defending Barbara West

WFTV.jpg

(Danville, California)

I know Barbara West. Barbara West is a friend of mine. It used to be standard practice in journalism to state any potential conflict of interest up front. That was the ethical standard, which like other ethics in a troubled profession, seems more and more ambiguous as the days go by.

But I state it up front. Call me “old school,” but I still value how I was taught, regardless of how others act. I’ve known Barbara West from WFTV in Orlando for many years. We worked for the same company and, indeed, spent many days covering stories together, most notably the Impeachment of President Clinton in 1998. Barbara was and still is an anchor/reporter for WFTV, the ABC affiliate owned by Cox Broadcasting. I was the Washington, DC, correspondent for all Cox TV stations.

Barbara is a tough but fair journalist, who plays no favorites. Which brings us to her much-talked-about interview with Joe Biden. She grilled him well. She asked him about ACORN, the controversial voter-registration-drive group. And she asked him about Barack Obama’s pledge to “spread the wealth” and whether that teetered on socialism - both good, tough questions, which I would have asked about, too.

Barbara did preface one question in regard to the Obama-Biden platform by quoting Karl Marx, which I thought was a bit “over the top.” I just wouldn’t have framed the question in that way. That question aside, I think this was a good, solid and fair interview.

That Joe Biden took such offense is his prerogative, but politicians of his stature should be used to tough questions by now. After all, we are not electing the president of the high school boosters club; we are electing the President of the United States. Biden shouldn’t be so thin skinned after 36 years in the Senate. As Chris Matthews always says, politics is a “hardball” endeavor.

The next day, Barbara interviewed John McCain in a similar format. She asked him some pretty tough questions, too, about dissention between the McCain and Palin camps and about the overall disorganization of the McCain campaign when compared to the well-oiled Obama machine - hardly softball questions at this critical juncture of the campaign.

Still, the liberal left came out swinging, noting that West’s husband Wade (whom I also know) worked for Republican candidates in Florida during the 1990s, though he no longer does. Some suggested he wrote her questions, which is a sexist slap. In the interview, Joe Biden actually said, “I don’t know who’s writing your questions,” which is about as sexist as it gets, given Barbara’s long and impressive credentials in TV, including a stint working for the legendary Peter Jennings. Had I asked the same questions, would someone have asked me who wrote my questions? No.

The most laughable part of this is that some now accuse WFTV of being a right-wing TV station. The ABC affiliate is owned by the Cox family of Atlanta, Georgia. If the name Cox rings a bell, it’s because company founder, James Cox, was the Democratic nominee for President in 1920. The three-term Ohio Governor lost to Warren Harding, but Cox went on to build a multibillion-dollar media empire. Today his heirs remain active in the Democratic Party and would hardly allow their TV station to be used as a Republican tool. (Truth be told, they stay out of newsroom editorial decisions, which is commendable).

I gave a lecture to a journalism class at San Jose State University the other day; and the students, their professor and I discussed the West interview after viewing it. While I said that I might word some questions differently, I gave West high praise for at least asking tough questions, instead of the “softballs” that are being lobbed by most in the media these days. Reporters are afraid to ask tough questions anymore because management is concerned that offended viewers will grab the remote control and change channels in an ever-shrinking audience and revenue stream.

Whether one likes her treatment of Joe Biden and John McCain, or not, at least Barbara West has the guts and intelligence to ask some tough, hard, pertinent questions of those who might lead this country. I support her 100 percent and wish the majority of our profession wasn’t so weak-kneed!

Keep checking in at www.MarkCurtisMedia.com.

Why the Infomercial Tax Message Was a Gaffe

Question Mark2.jpg

(Danville, California)

Boy, am I hearing from folks about the last column critiquing Barack Obama’s seemingly moving-target remark on tax cuts. Through most of his campaign, $250,000 of income has been the tax-cut ceiling (See his own website and You Tube.), but in Wednesday night’s infomercial, Obama said $200,000. Complicating matters is that Joe Biden tossed out the figure of $150,000 earlier this week (shown in the video above).

Now I have received numerous comments calling my analysis into question, and that’s fine. That’s what my comments sections are for. I have received all kinds of tortured, nuanced explanations for who gets a tax break and how. The neatest thing I found is the tax calculator on the Obama website, www.barackobama.com, in which you can enter your own data and receive an estimation of your promised tax cut. (By the way, I did it for a fictitious person with a $250,000 income, and they indeed got a tax cut; so I stand by my original column and analysis).

Here’s why the whole issue is a big mistake by the Obama campaign. This is not a question of math; it’s a question of strategy. With five days left in the campaign and a lead in just about every poll, you don’t want to raise an issue that can harm you in the waning days. While you don’t want to try to coast to victory, you don’t want to stick your foot in your mouth at the last minute either. This is precisely what the Obama-Biden campaign has done.

This is not a partisan critique. Earlier this year I wrote about a big McCain gaffe, when he spoke of Iran sending Sunni terrorists into Iraq, when in fact Iran is a Shiite country. (You may remember the video clip, when Joe Lieberman actually had to correct McCain). My point is that some candidate statement discrepancies are nuanced, while others are just flat out mistakes.

You don’t give the enemy any last minute ammunition, and this is what the Obama infomercial has done. If I was advising the McCain-Palin team, for the next five days I would hammer home this confusing “moving target” on tax cuts and who qualifies under the Obama plan. It may be the only shot they have left. This morning, Internet blogs are buzzing about the confusion.

The problem for McCain is that there is probably little public sympathy for people making between 200k and 250k, and little concern whether they should get an Obama tax cut or not. Nonetheless, this discrepancy is an Obama fumble, and the GOP must try to capitalize.

Keep checking back at www.MarkCurtisMedia.com.

Syndicate content