A full-service media consulting business • Multi-media campaigns, including internet • Freelance news reporting service • Political Commentary and Analysis • Voice-over talent, audio narration services, commercial voices • Public relations campaigns • Crisis communications consultants • Polling • Media training for business and executives • Press Release and News Conference preparation

An Impeachment Flashback That May Haunt 2020 – "Sunday Political Brunch" November 17, 2019


MORGANTOWN, W. Va. – The public impeachment inquiry of President Trump began this week, and it will be fascinating to see how it proceeds. In the past several weeks I have written a lot about comparisons to the impeachment processes involving Presidents Nixon and Clinton, both of which were prominent in my lifetime and career. But that made me curious about comparisons to the first presidential impeachment, that of President Andrew Johnson in 1868. Some of the similarities to today are stunning. Let’s “Brunch” on that this week:

“A Political Shotgun Marriage” – Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican President of the United States. Elected in 1860 and having presided over the Civil War and the end of slavery, he faced a daunting reelection bid in 1864 to try to unify a fractured nation. So, Lincoln dumped his GOP Vice President Hannibal Hamlin, and picked a Southern Democratic Senator Andrew Johnson, of Tennessee, to join his National Union ticket. Despite being from the South, Johnson opposed secession and the Civil War. But he did not support allowing freed slaves to become citizens. So, he had some baggage. He was billed as a War Democrat, who supported the Union. It made him few friends.

“On the Fast Track” – Just six weeks after taking the oath as vice president, Lincoln was assassinated, and Johnson was elevated to President. Still, he was a Democrat, and many of Lincoln’s fellow Republicans in Congress had difficulty embracing the new boss. Plus, Johnson was at odds with several Lincoln policies, including opposition to the 14th Amendment. Many Republicans treated him with contempt and suspicion.

“Midterm Troubles” – Tell me if this sounds familiar? You have a controversial (and in some quarters a very untrusted president), whose first big political test was the midterm election in 1866. Johnson’s Democrat Party suffered huge losses in Congress in 1866. Republicans won many more seats, exceeding a better than two-thirds majority in the House and Senate – enough to override presidential vetoes. Many Democrats worried that such midterm losses could spread like cancer to the next election in which the president would be on the ballot. Sound familiar?

“Citizenship Versus Immigration” – Slavery, and the end of it, was the big issue in the mid-1860s. While President Lincoln supported allowing former slaves to immediately become U.S. citizens, his vice president didn’t like that plan. Fast forward to 2019, and you have a president strongly at odds with plans to allow immigrants who came to the U.S. illegally, to be put on a path to citizenship. In no way am I equating slavery with illegal immigration, except to say they were very divisive and controversial issues in their day. Both Trump and Johnson were cheered and vilified for their hard-liner stances.

“Election Year Impeachment” – As I have reported several times, Presidents Nixon and Clinton had already been elected to their second terms when impeachment proceedings began. But Andrew Johnson and Donald Trump have something very much in common. Their impeachment events occurred in, or on, the eve of their reelection year. That’s an insightful and fascinating difference. Johnson was brought up on 11 articles of impeachment and had his Senate trial in May of 1868, just three months before his party’s nominating convention. Johnson defeated attempts to remove him from office, and on several counts, it was by one single vote. Yet, he was so politically wounded he was defeated by his own party for renomination in July 1868.

“A Political Versus Legal Strategy” – There are those on the Democratic side who have already concluded President Trump violated the law with his actions concerning Ukraine. To them it’s clearly an impeachable offense. Then, there are other Democrats who are very concerned that their party cannot beat Trump in November 2020. So, one option is to impeach Trump – regardless of whether the Senate will remove him from office – and offer the voters a very politically damaged candidate, much like Andrew Johnson. And you have to wonder if some other Republican, i.e. John Kasich, will offer himself as a potential alternative nominee at the national convention next year. Yes, history might repeat itself.

“Cabinet Disunity” – Another thing to look at in comparing the Trump and Johnson impeachments, is the issue of cabinet dissention and disloyalty. Both administrations had a lot of it. Johnson quarreled with, and eventually fired, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, who was ultimately reinstated by the Senate. Johnson tried to install General Ulysses Grant to Stanton’s post. Grant ultimately was elected president in 1868, beating the candidate who torpedoed Johnson’s renomination. Watch to see if some other Republican candidates step forward in 2020.

“The First ‘Comeback Kid’” – Some politicians – and I think Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton exemplified this – are alike a “cat with nine lives.” So, whatever happened to Andrew Johnson after he was voted out of the White House? Well he was elected to the U.S. Senate from Tennessee in 1874, and to this day is one of only two former presidents elected to Congress after a White House defeat, (John Quincy Adams was the other). Johnson had served only five months in his new Senate term, when he died in July 1875.

Do you think President Trump should be impeached, or not? Click the comment button and let us know!

Mark Curtis, Ed.D., is Chief Political Reporter for the five Nexstar Media TV stations serving West Virginia, its five surrounding states and most of the Washington, D.C. media market. He is a National Contributing Political Writer for “The White House Patch” at www.Patch.com.

© 2019 Mark Curtis Media, LLC

Photo courtesy: Library of Congress

The Kentucky Political Derby, (Not!) – “The Sunday Political Brunch” November 10, 2019


CHARLESTON, W. Va. – We tend to cover politics like it’s a horse race, and often it is. So, it was only fitting that we would have a photo finish in the "Kentucky Derby State.” Incumbent Gov. Matt Bevin (R) Kentucky, is some five-thousand votes behind Attorney General Andy Beshear (D) Kentucky, and may in fact lose the governor’s mansion. Many of my national political analyst colleagues are calling this a bellwether for the end of President Trump. But it isn’t by any stretch. Let’s “brunch” on that this week.

“Kentucky Reign” – I think it’s reasonable to assume Democrat Andy Beshear is the next Governor of Kentucky. Congrats to him and his family, as his dad was a two-term Kentucky Governor. But, is this the death of President Trump’s reelection bid? No. The governor’s race may in fact be an anomaly, because Republicans took every other competitive race in the state from Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, etc., all the way down to county dog catcher. So, for network analysts to suggest the Bluegrass State is in play in 2020, and might flip blue, is almost laughable. Trump carried the state by 30 percentage points in 2016. Still, he campaigned in Kentucky with Bevin the night before the vote, and it didn’t work.

“Why is That?” – There is a phenomenon known as “avoidance reaction,” which is essentially fleeing something or someone who turns you off. In Kentucky, Matt Bevin had a low approval rating. Many felt he picked the wrong side in a statewide teacher’s strike last year, and was wrong on the issue of LGBTQ rights. The fact that all other major statewide offices in Kentucky went Republican, tells you that the vote to oust Bevin was a vote against him, not a vote against Trump. My prediction: Kentucky stays solidly red in 2020.

“A Yellow Caution Light” – Given what I just said, I caution that Republicans should not be arrogant and assume all things are thumbs-up for Trump in Kentucky in 2020. On Wednesday morning, after the election, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R) Kentucky suddenly and finally gave his blessing to a bipartisan bill to save and protect the pensions of 100,000 current and retired coal miners and widows. McConnell has blocked this legislation for years, but suddenly did an about-face.

“All Politics is Local” -- I interviewed one of the miner’s pension bill’s co-sponsors, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R) West Virginia, and she said, “You know there are eight thousand miners in Kentucky that are impacted by the possibility of losing their pensions. And I’ve been working on Senator McConnell.” With the GOP holding a thin 53-47 margin in the U.S. Senate, (and Republicans defending more than twice as many Senate seats as Democrats in 2020), McConnell may be worried about losing his majority, and his leadership post.

“Virginia May Be the Cookie-Cutter” – I have said it dozens of times over the years in this column: “Political movements happen from the bottom up; not from the top down.” We pay too much attention to races for president and governor in trying to look for trends. That’s a mistake. The most important thing to look at are city councils, state legislatures, and yes, Congress. The State of Virginia was strongly controlled by Democrats for decades, until the 1990s when Republicans began to gain control of both houses of the legislature and occasionally the governor’s mansion, too. Well, as of election 2019, Democrats have now gained control of both the House of Delegates and State Senate, in addition to the governor’s mansion. A once solidly red state has turned blue.

“The Mississippi Political River” – While most of the nation and media were focused on the outcomes in Kentucky and Virginia, Mississippi was holding an election, too, for an open seat in the governor’s mansion. Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves (R) Mississippi, beat Attorney General Jim Hood (D) Mississippi, 52 to 47 percent. Mississippi, a solidly red state, is unlikely to flip in 2020.

“What’s Old is New Again” – Former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has launched a comeback bid to win his old U.S. Senate seat in Alabama. Sessions was the first Senator to endorse Donald Trump’s campaign for president in 2016. He was rewarded with a “Top Four” cabinet seat, but in his role as AG he quickly angered President Trump by recusing himself from the Russia investigation and appointing Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Trump fired Sessions a year ago, but now may need his help. Sessions could unseat Sen. Doug Jones (D) Alabama, perhaps the most vulnerable Senate Democrat in 2020. Will Trump and Sessions “kiss and make up?” Stay tuned, as politics often makes for strange bedfellows!

“What’s Trending?” – Since President Trump was elected in 2016, there have been 17 special elections for Congressional seats. Republicans held nine of their seats, while Democrats held four where they were incumbents. Democrats gained five seats that had been held by Republicans. But the GOP gained no seats from Democrats in places where they already held the seat. There is not much of a trend here to prognosticate forward. The bottom line, the incumbent party won 76 percent of the time.

What’s your prediction for the 2020 Senate races, and will Democrats seize control of the upper chamber of Congress? Just click the comment button!

Mark Curtis, Ed. D., is Chief Political Reporter for the five Nexstar Media TV stations serving West Virginia, its five neighboring states and most of the Washington, D.C. media market. He is a National Contributing Political Writer for “The White House Patch” at www.Patch.com.

© 2019, Mark Curtis Media, LLC

Photo courtesy: Getty Images

Syndicate content