A full-service media consulting business • Multi-media campaigns, including internet • Freelance news reporting service • Political Commentary and Analysis • Voice-over talent, audio narration services, commercial voices • Public relations campaigns • Crisis communications consultants • Polling • Media training for business and executives • Press Release and News Conference preparation

Thinning the Political Herd – Sunday Political Brunch May 5, 2019

2016_GOP_Debates.jpg

CHARLESTON, W. Va. – There are twenty Democratic candidates for president, but you can only have one nominee. I am watching Miss USA 2019 as I write this, and realize it’s a very similar process. There are 51 contestants but only one will become Miss USA. By the way, I am thankful presidential politics has no swim suit competition! But you do have to find ways to stand out in the crowd. Let’s “brunch” on that this week.

“Passion Play” – Whether you agree with his politics or not, there’s hardly a candidate that has as much raw passion as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) Vermont. Sanders gets worked up and downright angry at times. He can stir up a crowd. It’s fascinating that one of the oldest candidates (age 77), can have such passionate appeal to the youngest voters. Sanders is raw, which is maybe why he has such rabid support among young people.

“Outside the Box” – You can think back to not too distant times where a gay candidate would almost be immediately dismissed just based on his homosexuality. Yes, there were Congressmen Barney Frank, Gerry Studds and Steve Gunderson, but those are local districts, not the whole Electoral College map. Fast forward to 2019, and we have an openly gay candidate in Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D) South Bend. But Buttigieg was a U.S. Navy officer and served in the war in Afghanistan. He’s also a Rhodes Scholar. So, he is smart and brave, and nobody seems to really care much that he’s married to another man. He has an interesting niche.

“Mixing it Up” – Sen. Kamala Harris (D) California has an interesting mix. Her dad was Jamaican, and her mother was Indian, and she’s the third woman to serve California in the U.S. Senate. She’s been a District Attorney and an Attorney General, so she comes to the table with real political and policy experience. Plus, winning statewide in California requires pulling together a broad tapestry of voters. She’s formidable.

“Experience is Hard to Beat” – If voters are looking towards someone with a long, deep resume, then that helps former Vice President Joe Biden. With 36-years in the U.S. Senate, and eight in the White House, he has a resume that may be tough to beat. But in 2008, Democrats chose someone with an inspiring story and a great stump speech (Obama) over a candidate who had a lot more experience (Clinton). So, experience can be an asset, or it can conversely say, “this person has been around too darn long.” Biden must play his cards carefully.

“Not Just a Pretty Face” – Like Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Rep Tulsi Gabbard (D) Hawaii is in her 30s. She has striking good looks and has a lot of opportunities ahead of her. And like Buttigieg she has military experience in the U.S. Army, having served in the Iraq War. Military service is a political asset, and not everyone has it. A lot of voters who might otherwise dismiss a female or gay candidate, might take a different look knowing that a candidate served their county in a war zone.

“Being Inventive?” – We don’t just have career politicians in the race. How about someone with no political experience, but who has a ton of experience in the tech sector and the philanthropic community? Andrew Yang is just such a person and he’s also running for the Democratic nomination for president. His skill set is outside the traditional political box and separates him clearly from the other candidates. If that sounds vaguely family, it’s because it’s similar (not ideologically) to the tack Donald Trump took to the White House standing on a similar stage with approximately 20 other candidates. Yang can really contrast himself to the others. Might work!

“Avoiding the ‘Trump Trap’” – The candidates can’t make a contest out of who despises President Trump the most. He’ll just beat you down with tweets and more tweets. Just ask Senator Elizabeth Warren (D) Massachusetts. He goads her into responding and she takes the bait, and he always seems to get the last word. It’s a race down a rabbit hole.

“Why All of This Matters” – Democrats in the year 2020, risk campaigning as 20 shades of vanilla. There is a big push in the party to be the most progressive candidate. Everyone seems to be pushing “Medicare for All” and “Free College” or student loan forgiveness. As mentioned, candidates need to focus on identifying their clear differences and making themselves stand out as unique. Tell me why you are more qualified that the others. Otherwise, we might as well just pick names out of a hat. Now, I’ve addressed seven of the 20 candidates here, we’ll do another analysis of the rest in the coming weeks!

If you voted today, who would you pick for president in 2020? Click the comment button!

Mark Curtis, Ed. D, is Chief Political Reporter for the five Nexstar Media TV stations serving West Virginia, its five surrounding states and most of the Washington, D.C. media market. He’s a weekly contributing writer for the White House Patch at www.Patch.com.

© 2019, Mark Curtis Media, LLC.

Photo courtesy: Getty Images

The Mueller Report Aftermath - Sunday Political Brunch April 28, 2019

Trump_Mueller_Getty.jpg

CHARLESTON, W. Va. – “It’s not over ‘til it’s over,” baseball legend Yogi Berra famously said. And that yardstick works in politics as well as sports. President Trump believes Special Counsel Robert Mueller gave him a clean bill of health on the issues of collusion and obstruction. While the former may be clear, the latter has lingering doubters. The legal battle may be over, but the political fight is already underway. Let’s “brunch” on that this week:

“Impeach; Don’t Impeach” – The Democrats have a problem. Although they have a big majority in the House (where impeachment must originate), it is truly a party divided. Many Democrats want to begin impeachment articles against President Trump, but key leaders such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi do not. The main argument against, is that while Democrats probably have the votes to impeach the president in the House, they have nowhere near the 67 votes in the Republican-controlled Senate to remove him from office. Plus, there’s an election in 18 months where voters can dispatch him from the White House if they wish. Impeachment may not be practical here.

“Elizabeth Warren Strategy” – On the other hand, campaigning for impeachment may offer a big plus for some candidates. One of the biggest backers of impeachment is Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D) Massachusetts, who is also running for president. She and Trump despise each other with a passion. "The accountability for the President lies through Congress. And that's the impeachment process," Warren said this week. Strategically this is a good issue for her. She can lobby hard for impeachment, even though she knows full-well it’s unlikely to ever happen. Since she’s in the Senate, she can nudge the House all she wants to start the process, with no real backlash. With 20 candidates in the race, each Democrat needs to find a way to stand out from the pack. This is Warren’s spot.

“The Bill Clinton Experience” – “Be careful what you wish for, because you might just get it,” is a tried and true old saying. I’m not sure who originated it, but it’s money. In 1998, Republicans may have over-played their hand in impeaching President Clinton. While much of the public was outraged over Bill Clinton’s personal indiscretions, many people did not think it rose to removing him from office. Republicans pressed ahead, but it backfired as a campaign issue in the 1998 midterm election, where the party out of power in the White House usually gains seats in Congress. Instead, Republicans suffered a net loss of five seats, and the rank and file rebelled, forcing Gingrich to resign as House Speaker, and from his seat in the House.

“Now and Then” – Yes there are similarities to 1998 and 2019, but there are differences, too. In 1998, Republicans held both chambers of Congress. In 2019, the House is controlled by Democrats and the Senate by Republicans with a 53-47 margin. But remember, the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to remove an impeached president from office. In 1999, only 45 Senators (all Republicans) voted to remove Bill Clinton from office for perjury, and 50 voted (again all Republican), to remove him for perjury. They came far short of 67, and my guess is the same shortage would occur for President Trump. Undoing an election by the people is a tough task to accomplish.

“Finding 67?” – Well if you couldn’t find 67 Senators to remove Bill Clinton in 1999, how do you find 67 this year? Assuming all 47 Democrats currently in the U.S. Senate vote to remove Trump from office, you still need 20 Republicans to join them. The task gets even tougher when Democrats start to jump ship, and one already has. "The Mueller Report did not go down the path of impeachment. After two years of some of the top lawmakers, and the Department of Justice investigating this for two years, did not find that type of a cause," Sen. Joe Manchin (D) West Virginia, said to me this week.

“Let’s Get to Work!” – One of the common mantras of Democrats during Bill Clinton’s impeachment was essentially, “We have far more serious work in Washington we need to attend to.” Fast forward to 2019 and a lot of Republicans are singing the same tune about focusing on issues that matter to people. "Increase jobs, get an infrastructure package, help with the drug crisis, all the things that we've worked on. But if we get off into this circus of impeachment hearings, I think would be counterproductive," Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, (R) West Virginia told me this week.

“Biden In” – The other big political news this week was the entrance of former Vice President Joe Biden into the presidential race in 2020. Biden announced his candidacy in a polished campaign video distributed online. Right now, polling indicates that Biden is the clear frontrunner among Democrats, but it’s early and polls could be very volatile with 20 candidates. Maybe I’m old-school when it comes to campaign kick-offs, but I think Biden should have had a big rally with live broadcasts on the cable networks and online. Announcing via video is akin to “phoning it in.” Look at 76, one of his biggest tasks will be to convince voters that he has the vigor and energy for not only the campaign, but for the grueling job of president. The video announcement is by no means a fatal mistake, but I think a seasoned pro with 44 years of public service as Biden has, the kick-off was met with a thud. We’ll see!

Impeachment, yes or no? Click the comment button and let me know your vote and why?

Mark Curtis, Ed.D., is Chief Political Reporter for the five Nexstar Media TV Stations serving West Virginia and the five surrounding states, and much of the Washington, D.C. media market. He hosts “Inside West Virginia Politics” every Sunday across the state network.

© 2019, Mark Curtis Media, LLC.

Photo courtesy: Getty Images

Syndicate content