A full-service media consulting business • Multi-media campaigns, including internet • Freelance news reporting service • Political Commentary and Analysis • Voice-over talent, audio narration services, commercial voices • Public relations campaigns • Crisis communications consultants • Polling • Media training for business and executives • Press Release and News Conference preparation

It’s Not Over ‘til It’s Over in Minnesota

Al Franken Dish.jpg

(Danville, California)

Only a comedy writer could write a script this funny. So even if he doesn’t win the U.S. Senate seat in Minnesota, maybe Al Franken can go back to “Saturday Night Live.”

As of now, the official state recount is over. Republican incumbent Norm Coleman, the former St. Paul Mayor, leads Franken by just 192 votes. You’d think Coleman would be throwing a victory party, but hold on.

There are 133 “missing” ballots from Minneapolis; and until they are found and counted or ruled ineligible, this race isn’t over. Franken is making legal challenges, and some ballots are still being disputed. The big question remains: How did 133 ballots mysteriously go missing?

Now you can do the math. Even if Franken wins all 133 missing votes, he is still 60 short of beating Coleman. This may drag on for a while, but expect Norm Coleman to be declared the winner soon. That will give the Democrats a working majority of 58 Senators in Washington, to 42 for the GOP. Democrats needed 60 seats to have a filibuster-proof majority.

The big question now is whether the Republicans will just provide “Senatorial courtesy” to President Obama and approve all of his Cabinet picks. Or, will someone launch a filibuster to block Eric Holder or Hillary Clinton, the two most likely targets? It could get interesting. Republicans need to claim victory on something after getting blown away on Election Day. My prediction is someone on the GOP side is going to spice things up by picking a fight since the Democrats don’t have 60 votes to block it!

Keep checking in at www.MarkCurtisMedia.com.

Making the Case for Caroline Kennedy

Caroline Kennedy Obama.jpg

(Danville, California)

Maybe I’m about to contradict myself, so be sure to write in with your comments. Earlier this week I laid out the case why Bill Clinton should not replace his wife in the U.S. Senate and why Beau Biden should not replace his dad (Beau has already declined). Both would have been by appointment. On the other hand, I fully expect Jeb Bush to run for a U.S. Senate seat in Florida with a good shot at winning. The difference is appointment vs. election. If you want to run on your famous name, fine; but to expect a free pass because you are famous is another matter.

So let me break my own rule.

There are reports that Caroline Kennedy is, indeed, interested in being named a U.S. Senator from New York to replace Hillary Clinton. If the appointment is offered, she should take it. I think she would do a good job.

Caroline has always been a low-key Kennedy, and I admire that. Some of her cousins have not been so; and their behavior has at times tarnished the family name. From Patrick Kennedy and his odd drug and alcohol escapades to William Kennedy Smith and his arrogance, some of the Kennedys appear to have acted with a sense of entitlement. To be fair, I think it’s tough to be a Kennedy. The expectations and pressures the mere name must bring are monumental. Some of the Bush kids and grandchildren have been beset by the same problems. Fame is bipartisan in bestowing its blessing, or its curse.

The Kennedys have done some great things. Near and dear to my heart is their work with the Special Olympics. So I don’t criticize them lightly.

That brings me to Caroline. Unlike some of her mischievous cousins, she has shunned the limelight and has been almost a recluse. She and her husband did a marvelous job of keeping their own three kids out of the spotlight. But Caroline is one of those behind-the-scenes folks who can get things done. She’s not flashy or a braggart. She knows who’s who in the political and business world; and she’s been a “go to” person who can pick up the phone for certain causes and quietly get things done.

She’s smart, she’s confident, she’s mature and she often strikes me as indebted to her country, not entitled by it. That last-mentioned quality is the one that always impressed me about John McCain, too. Like McCain, Caroline Kennedy is in her family’s third generation of public service. For them to feel they still “owe” rather than “are owed” is commendable.

Another thing that’s appealing about Kennedy is that she won’t be just a caretaker for the Senate seat until the next election can be held. I would expect her to be an activist Senator and a political broker. At a time when Washington needs bipartisanship, she knows how to reach across party lines and deal with competing ideas and interests. Only truly savvy and practical politicians know how to do that. She’s the kind of person who can broker a deal and perhaps reform and pass the No Child Left Behind Act I wrote of Friday that remains on life support on Capitol Hill.

What are her credentials? Consider these items from her biography at Wikipedia.org: “From 2002 to 2004, Kennedy worked as chief executive for the Office of Strategic Partnerships for the New York City Department of Education. During this time, she helped raise more than $65 million for the city’s public schools. She currently serves as the Vice Chair of The Fund for Public Schools, a public-private partnership founded in 2002 to attract private funding for public schools in New York City.”

Caroline Kennedy was also born in New York and spent much of her childhood and adult life as a resident. No one could call her a “carpetbagger!”

Write in with your comments if you think I’m advocating a double standard; but I think if she is offered the Senate seat Caroline Kennedy should accept.

You can submit comments on any topic or suggest a column at www.MarkCurtisMedia.com

Syndicate content